Second Amendment rebuttal: Colion Noir on what your gun is for

Key points: Second Amendment rebuttal Colion

• The influencer's question, what is your gun for, is fair, but she first shrank liberty down to the right to own a gun, which he calls a red herring wrapped around a straw man.
• Citing the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights, he defines liberty as rights that exist before government: speech, religion, protection from unreasonable searches, due process, the Ninth Amendment's unlisted rights and the individual right to keep and bear arms confirmed in Heller.
• Her caption assigns views on the Fourth and 14th Amendments to gun owners without showing any of them saying it, which he calls whataboutism built on a straw man.
• Every example in her caption is government abuse of power, so asking that same government to decide who may defend themselves is, in his words, cognitive dissonance.
• Protecting the gun means protecting what the gun protects: the Second Amendment backs every other limit on what government may do to you.
• The everyday answer to when a gun gets used is self-defense: someone kicking in the door at 2 a.m., a robbery in a parking garage, the minutes before police arrive.
• He supports firearms education but wants specifics on any proposed regulation: what it does, who it stops and why someone already breaking laws would obey it.

About this Drama and Gripe video

Second Amendment rebuttal from Colion Noir, answering an anti-gun influencer who asked what a gun is for and claimed gun owners mean only the right to own a gun when they talk about liberty. He defines liberty from the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights, calls her caption a straw man that pins views on gun owners she never shows, and notes that every grievance she lists is government overreach. He then answers when a gun gets used: a home invasion, a parking-garage robbery, the minutes before police arrive.

Transcript: Second Amendment rebuttal